Osteoporosis and
HIV Disease
Bone disorders have emerged as a
worrisome complication in persons with HIV infection.
Over the past few years there have been increasing
reports of osteoporosis (wasting of bone tissue due to
bone mineral depletion) and osteopenia (moderate bone
mineral depletion) in HIV-positive adults and children.
(Osteonecrosis, or death of bone tissue -- a
complication apparently unrelated to bone mineral
depletion also found in persons with HIV -- will be
examined in an upcoming issue of BETA.) To date, the
causes of bone mineral deficiencies in those with HIV
have not been well characterized, and data related to
bone health in this population are now increasingly
being collected and analyzed. Though they are currently
uncommon in HIV-positive individuals, skeletal fractures
associated with osteoporosis can be painful,
debilitating, and potentially life-threatening,
offsetting any quality-of-life advantages gained by
current use of antiretroviral medications where
available.
Osteoporosis in HIV-Positive Persons
Recent reports of low BMD in
individuals with HIV disease have confounded health
experts. While it is true that in any group of people a
certain number will have osteopenia and fewer still
osteoporosis (see the
normal distribution curve),
men, women, and children with HIV infection appear to be
far more prone to low BMD than their age-matched,
HIV-negative counterparts. Remarkably, fractures related
to low BMD in persons with HIV have been extremely rare
to date -- but the risk is nevertheless very real and
will likely increase over time.
The problem of thinning bones in
HIV-positive persons has been described in the
literature and at medical conferences only in the past
few years. Mary Romeyn, M.D., of the University of
California, San Francisco (UCSF) and Julia Ireland, D.O.
(Doctor of Osteopathy), of the University of Southern
California (USC) were among the first to report on this
problem. At the 3rd International Conference on
Nutrition and HIV Infection, held April 22-25, 1999, in
Cannes, France, Drs. Romeyn and Ireland reported that
among 20 HIV-positive men with CD4 cell count nadirs
(lowest levels) at or below 100 cells/mm3,
nine (45%) had evidence of osteopenia and eight (40%)
were diagnosed with osteoporosis. Only three (15%) of
the twenty subjects had normal BMD levels. Eight other
men with CD4 cell nadirs above 100 cells/mm3
all showed signs of bone density deficiencies: one (13%)
had osteoporosis and the remaining seven (87%) had
osteopenia. At the 7th Conference on Retroviruses and
Opportunistic Infections (CROI) held in San Francisco in
early 2000, Pablo Tebas, M.D., and colleagues from
Washington University in St. Louis, MO, reported that
among 64 HIV-positive subjects taking protease
inhibitors (PIs), 32 (50%) were found to have osteopenia
and 14 (21%) had osteoporosis. At the same conference,
Jennifer Hoy, M.D., of Alfred Hospital in Melbourne,
Australia, reported that among a cohort of 74
HIV-positive persons with evidence of lipodystrophy
(defined as total body fat less than 20% by DEXA
scanning) and suppressed viremia (viral load below 400
copies/mL), 21 (28%) had evidence of osteopenia at
baseline and an additional seven (9%) had osteoporosis.
At the 8th CROI this past winter, at
least 15 abstracts, posters, and late-breaker
presentations focused on bone mineral disorders.
Overall, according to various reports presented at the
8th CROI, evidence of osteopenia (based on lumbar spine
[comprising the lower back] studies) was found in 21-45%
of persons with HIV infection.
Role of HAART
It is unknown what role, if any,
highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) plays in
the development of low BMD. Studies conducted so far
offer conflicting evidence as to whether HAART use
lowers BMD and which specific drug classes are more
likely to be involved. At this early stage, theories
regarding causes of bone mineral deficiencies in those
with HIV disease are merely speculative.
The unexpectedly high rates of bone
mineral loss reported by Drs. Tebas and Hoy (mentioned
above) were found in cohorts of persons with extensive
histories of PI therapy. Dr. Tebas' research team also
noted that persons taking PI-containing regimens had
rates of osteopenia (40-50%) about twice as high as
those found in persons taking non-PI-containing regimens
or no therapy (20-23%). Other researchers have noted
similarly higher rates in persons taking PIs.
The precise mechanisms explaining how
PIs might give rise to bone wasting are not known. Dr.
Tebas has reported on in vitro (test-tube) studies
showing that three PIs -- ritonavir, indinavir (Crixivan),
and nelfinavir (Viracept) -- inhibit the conversion of
25(OH)-vitamin D3 (the natural form of the vitamin) to
its most potent (bioactive) metabolite, known as
1,25(OH)2-vitamin D, by 80%,
66%, and 31%, respectively.
Vitamin D must be in its most bioactive form to properly
regulate calcium homeostasis (balance), and therefore
BMD levels, in the body. These findings have yet to be
reproduced in human studies.
Other researchers discount the
possible role of PIs in bone wasting. Drs. Romeyn and
Ireland have found in their cohort of 44 HIV-positive
men that those with greater exposure to non-nucleoside
reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) were more
likely to have osteoporosis. PI use did not seem to
affect rates of bone loss in this cohort (26% of whom
were diagnosed with osteoporosis). These data appeared
in a poster presentation at the 4th International
Conference on Nutrition and HIV Infection held April
19-21, 2001, in Cannes.
Some researchers believe that lactic
acidemia and proposed mitochondrial toxicity associated
with nucleoside analog (NRTI) use may be the main
culprit. (Lactic acidemia refers to increased levels of
lactic acid, which can reduce the normal pH of blood.
Mitochondrial toxicity refers to dysfunction of
mitochondria, which produce energy within cells.) At the
2nd International Workshop on Adverse Drug Reactions and
Lipodystrophy held September 23-25, 2000, in Toronto,
Andrew Carr, M.D., and colleagues from St. Vincent's
Hospital in Sydney, Australia, reported results of a
study assessing BMD in 221 HIV-positive men (mean age of
43 years) recruited to a lipodystrophy (fat
redistribution) prevalence survey. The Australian
researchers evaluated several parameters (markers) that
they hypothesize may be linked with low BMD, including
symptoms and signs associated with lactic acidemia (such
as nausea, fatigue, and loss of at least 3 kg of body
weight within the preceding three months). Forty-four
subjects (20%) were found to have osteopenia and seven
(3%) had osteoporosis. The only significant independent
risk factors associated with low BMD were higher lactate
levels (odds ratio [OR] of 2.39 per 1 mmol/liter) and
lower weight (OR of 1.06 per 1 kg decrease) prior to
starting antiretroviral therapy. (Lactate is the salt
form of lactic acid found in the blood.) Both lactic
acidemia and duration of NRTI therapy were associated
with low spinal (but not low total) BMD. Associations,
however, do not necessarily imply a cause-and-effect
relationship.
Dr. Carr's team postulated that
osteopenia in HIV-positive men may be more likely with
lower body mass prior to antiretroviral therapy and "the
cumulative duration and magnitude of NRTI-induced lactic
acidemia." Dr. Carr suggested that NRTIs may have a
direct, damaging effect on the mitochondria of
osteoblasts, rendering them less able to form bone. (He
did not prove this, however.) He has also suggested that
chronic lactic acidemia may cause a bone salt vital to
the compressional strength of the vertebrae (hydroxyapatite)
to be leached from bone to buffer a higher acid load in
the bloodstream.
To date, theories regarding lactic
acidemia, NRTIs, and low BMD have not been adequately
supported with data and remain controversial. Study
design, as always, impacts the value of data and their
potential to be widely applicable. Dr. Carr's study
mentioned above was cross-sectional (evaluating subjects
at one particular time), not prospective (evaluating
subjects forward over time). Prospective, or
longitudinal, studies yield more reliable data and are
almost always preferable. Interestingly, another report
given at the 8th CROI by S. Claxton and colleagues from
Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
found no association between osteopenia and lactate
levels (or levels of leptin, a neurotransmitter that
regulates appetite) in HIV-positive men. These nearly
opposite findings may relate to differing methodologies
used by the research teams.
Low Bone Mineral Density in Antiretroviral-Naive Persons
Several very recent studies have found
high rates of bone mineral loss in HIV-positive persons
who have never taken anti-HIV drugs. Such reports make
it difficult to determine why bone mineral abnormalities
were not commonly associated with HIV disease in the
literature prior to widespread use of HAART (although
anecdotal reports of low BMD in HIV-positive individuals
date back to at least 1995, before the era of potent
antiretroviral therapy). The majority of data presented
at the 8th CROI this past February suggested that
persons treated with HAART were not more likely to
experience osteopenia than those who were
antiretroviral-naive. For example, Adeyemi Lawal, M.D.,
and colleagues from St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital in New
York City found equivalent rates of reduced BMD in a
cohort of 36 HIV-positive men assessed in 1993 (pre-HAART)
and a cohort of 22 HIV-positive, HAART-treated subjects
(three women, 19 men) assessed in 1998. (However, there
may have been confounding factors in those tested in
1993, e.g., use of corticosteroids as part of treatment
for PCP and antifungal therapy.) Hernando Knobel, M.D.,
Ph.D., and colleagues from the Hospital del Mar in
Barcelona found osteopenia in four of 16
antiretroviral-naive subjects (25%), and a statistical
difference in osteopenia rates between only HIV-positive
and HIV-negative subjects (not between HIV-positive
subjects taking HAART and those who had never taken
therapy).
Although very preliminary, reports of
bone mineral loss in antiretroviral-naive persons are
particularly troublesome, as they suggest that prolonged
duration of HIV infection or some mechanism linked to
HIV disease may be a key factor in the prevalence of the
condition. The reports also appear to refute claims that
various antiretroviral drugs are responsible for
lowering BMD. Nevertheless, it may be that some anti-HIV
medications are a cofactor in bone mineral loss if other
cofactors are present.
Additional Factors
Numerous other factors, either alone
or in combination, might explain unusually high
osteopenia and osteoporosis rates in HIV-positive
individuals. Interest in these potential contributing
causes will likely increase, as data regarding loss of
bone tissue in antiretroviral-naive persons continue to
accumulate.
Some additional risk factors are
characteristics found in older people that are present
in some (nonelderly) people with HIV, especially those
with later-stage disease and AIDS-related wasting
syndrome. These include immobilization or extended bed
rest, malnutrition, malabsorption (reduced capacity to
absorb dietary nutrients), severe weight loss, and
reduced production of sunlight-associated vitamin D.
Hypogonadism, a condition that
commonly affects both older individuals and persons with
HIV, is a particular concern. Hypogonadism refers to
inadequate function of the gonads (sex organs including
the ovaries or testes) characterized in part by
deficient hormone secretion (estrogen or testosterone).
Below-average serum testosterone levels (male
hypogonadism) are found in approximately 25% of
asymptomatic HIV-positive men who are not taking
anti-HIV treatment and up to 50% of men with untreated
AIDS. Low levels of sex hormones are known to cause low
BMD in both men and women. Nevertheless, not all studies
have shown significant bone loss in HIV-positive persons
with low testosterone levels. (Women also produce small
amounts of testosterone and may develop complications as
a result of low levels.) Studies of BMD in HIV-positive
women with low female sex hormone levels remain to be
conducted.
Researchers have also been looking
into the roles played by growth hormone and insulin-like
growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Among its other effects on the
body, growth hormone (secreted by the pituitary gland)
profoundly influences the body's ability to regenerate
lost bone tissue. Secretions of growth hormone trigger
production of IGF-1 in the liver; IGF-1 in turn
stimulates osteoblasts to increase bone mass. As people
age, their growth hormone levels often progressively
decrease, and adults with a deficiency of growth hormone
and IGF-1 have been shown in some studies to
have lower BMD. As the growth
hormone-IGF-1 axis (or feedback loop) is known to be
impaired in those with HIV infection, this metabolic
disturbance may have a significant effect on BMD and
bone loss in this population.
High cytokine levels also may be a
risk factor for bone loss in people with HIV. Cytokines
coordinate immune responses by communicating among
immune system cells and between immune system cells and
the rest of the body. Proinflammatory cytokines amplify
immune responses, while anti-inflammatory cytokines
diminish immune responses. Certain proinflammatory
cytokines -- including interleukins 1, 6, 8, and 12, and
tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -- intensify the resorptive
activity of osteoclasts; aberrations in cytokine levels
thus may lead to increased bone destruction and risk of
osteoporosis. As cytokines arise from white blood cells,
including CD4 cells, HIV-positive persons with higher
activated CD4 cell levels tend to have higher levels of
certain cytokines. Whether this phenomenon corresponds
with higher rates of osteopenia and osteoporosis remains
to be proven in clinical trials. Approaches to anti-HIV
therapy may be affected if different classes of
antiretroviral drugs influence cytokines in different
ways.
Calcium homeostasis in the body is
maintained partly by vitamin D activity and in part by a
feedback loop that involves the interplay of two
hormones: calcitonin and parathyroid hormone (PTH, or
parathormone). Calcitonin, which is produced in the
thyroid gland, lowers the level of calcium in blood
plasma by inactivating osteoclasts and helps to maintain
a strong, dense bone matrix. PTH, which is secreted by
the parathyroid glands, enables bone resorption (and
indirectly promotes increased intestinal absorption of
calcium) by activating osteoclasts. PTH levels tend to
increase with age and, reportedly, in those with HIV
disease. While the mechanisms disrupting the
PTH-calcitonin axis are not known, future research may
shed light on ways to inhibit this phenomenon.
Unusually high levels of thyroid
hormone (thyroxine) can also cause bone loss. Excess
thyroxine may be due to hyperthyroidism or poorly
monitored thyroxine replacement therapy in persons with
hypothyroidism (diminished thyroid function).
Lipodystrophy
and Wasting
Some researchers have conjectured that
bone mineral deficiencies may be associated with body
fat abnormalities (also called lipodystrophy) seen in
HIV-positive persons, as low BMD was first widely
detected in people enrolled in lipodystrophy studies.
However, studies to date have not shown a correlation
between bone wasting and raised levels of blood lipids
(fats) and/or disturbances in the locations and quantity
of adipose (fat-storing) tissue.
Dr. J.S. Huang and colleagues from
Massachusetts General Hospital and Children's Hospital,
Boston, reported at the 8th CROI that increased visceral
(intra-abdominal) fat among 41 HIV-positive subjects was
significantly associated with decreased BMD. In this
cross-sectional, observational study, Dr. Huang's team
found that the association between low BMD and an
accumulation of visceral fat remained significant after
controlling for age, PI use, lowest body weight, BMI,
and extremity fat (in the arms and legs) in a
multivariate analysis. (Once again, however, an
association does not necessarily imply a
cause-and-effect relationship.) At the same
conference, Dr. Tebas and
colleagues from Washington University reported that
increased intra-abdominal fat did not affect BMD
T-scores of the lumbar spine in their cohort of 34
subjects (one woman, three African-Americans).
Osteopenia was observed in 15 HIV-positive subjects
(45%) regardless of the quantity of adipose tissue in
their abdominal region. No significant correlation was
found between lumbar spine BMD T-scores and visceral
adipose mass or the visceral fat/total abdominal area
ratio using DEXA and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
scans.
Unlike those with lipodystrophy,
persons with AIDS-related wasting syndrome clearly
exhibit known risk factors for bone deficiencies; it is
therefore not surprising that studies have shown low BMD
levels in this population. Steven Grinspoon, M.D., and
colleagues from Massachusetts General Hospital and
Harvard Medical School recently described low lumbar
spine and total hip BMD values among 54 men with AIDS
wasting compared with 35 healthy, HIV-negative controls.
Total hip T-scores were below -1 (indicating osteopenia
of the hip) in 17 (33%) of the men with AIDS wasting.
All of the subjects with AIDS wasting had free (unbound)
testosterone levels in the normal range; hypogonadism
was therefore not a factor in the development of
osteopenia in these men. Dr. Grinspoon's team published
their study data in the May 2001 issue of the Journal of
Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.
As with HIV-positive adults, bone
mineral deficiencies in HIV-positive children and
adolescents have been reported only recently. Evidence
of osteopenia and osteoporosis in these young people is
particularly disturbing not only because they are at
risk for achieving suboptimal peak bone mass (a risk
factor for osteoporosis) but also because their BMD
levels appear to decrease with age. Stephen Arpadi,
M.D., M.S., of St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital in New York
City described a cross-sectional study of 51
HIV-positive children and 282 healthy control children
(average age was 8.4 years; 52% males and 48% females)
in a late-breaker session at the 8th CROI. Dr. Arpadi's
team found that abnormal reductions in total body bone
mineral content (TBBMC) were significantly associated
with HIV status in their cohort and that TBBMC
reductions progressed with age. TBBMC levels were not
significantly associated with CD4 cell counts, CD4 cell
percentages, or use of PI drugs.
Treatment
While researchers and physicians
attempt to identify the cause or causes of brittle bones
in HIV-positive persons, those who have this health
problem are in need of interventions. Fortunately,
several standard treatments have been used to prevent
further bone deterioration and a handful of possible
therapies may even reverse the loss of bone. Physiologic
differences between women and men, as well as between
younger and older women, must be taken into account when
considering treatment strategies related to bone health.
Adequate intake of calcium and vitamin
D should be part of any treatment regimen involving loss
of bone. Calcium is the most essential micronutrient for
achieving and sustaining bone mass and for treating
osteoporosis. However, while calcium supplementation
helps to maintain adequate BMD in postmenopausal women,
it has not been shown to prevent loss of bone by itself.
The National Academy of Sciences recommends a daily
calcium intake of 1,000mg in adult women aged 19-50 and
1,200-1,500mg per day in postmenopausal women (above age
50). Currently no standard recommendations have been
established for men or persons with HIV. Good sources of
dietary calcium include dairy products, fruits, and
vegetables. Calcium supplements also may be used,
although they may cause adverse effects such as
constipation. Vitamin D, which is fat-soluble (able to
dissolve in fat), helps to maintain normal blood levels
of calcium and phosphorous, and allows for optimal
absorption of calcium. The National Institutes of Health
(NIH) recommends an intake of 200 IU (international
units) per day in adults aged 19-50, 400 IU per day in
adults aged 51-69, and 600 IU in adults aged 70 and
older (recommendations are identical for women and men).
At least part of the recommended daily intake may be met
with 15 minutes or more of (unclothed) skin exposure to
natural sunlight three times per week. Good dietary
sources include fish-liver oils, egg yolks, and milk and
other foods such as breads and breakfast cereals that
are fortified with vitamin D. Persons taking PI drugs
for HIV should consult with a health-care provider
before considering raising vitamin D intake, as PIs tend
to result in high rather than low levels of vitamin D
and other fat-soluble vitamins.
Weight-bearing, or high-impact,
exercise is also highly recommended (by the American
Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, among many others) in
persons with low BMD. Weight-bearing exercise -- in
which force is exerted against the weight of gravity --
stimulates bone formation and strengthens muscles that
are attached to bone. It also improves overall balance
and agility, which reduces risk of falls and bone
injuries. Examples of this type of exercise include
weight training, use of Nautilus or Thera-Band
equipment, brisk walking, hiking, jogging, and
exercising on a stair-climbing or cross-country ski
machine. (Weight training and use of Nautilus-type
machinery are also known as progressive resistance
exercise.) Swimming and bicycling are not weight-bearing
activities and do not put adequate stress on bone. To
gain maximum benefit, weight-bearing exercise should be
performed for one hour at least three times per week on
a regular basis.
A variety of drug and hormonal
interventions has shown efficacy in treating either the
disrupted mechanisms of bone metabolism and/or low BMD
and brittle bones in people who are HIV negative.
Biphosphonates are antiresorptive molecules that help to
restore bone mass in persons with established
osteoporosis and reduce the incidence of fracture. Two
biphosphonates have been approved by the FDA to treat
osteoporosis in women: alendronate (Fosamax) and
risedronate (Actonel). These two drugs, in addition to
etidronate (Didrocal, which is not FDA-approved for
treating osteoporosis), all increased BMD of the spine
and hip in a dose-dependent manner and reduced the risk
of vertebral fractures by 30-50% in placebo-controlled,
randomized clinical trials. Data for use of
biphosphonates in men are still being gathered for
review. Calcitonin supplementation has been shown in
some settings to reduce the risk of fracture. A small
prospective study done by Drs. Romeyn and Ireland found
that calcitonin stabilized or improved BMD in some
osteoporotic HIV-positive men who were also receiving
optimal care for their HIV infection, endocrine
deficiencies (all were hypogonadal), and nutritional
needs (all had a history of AIDS wasting). However, the
five-year Prevent Recurrence of Osteoporotic Fractures
(PROOF) study of calcitonin involving 1,255 women was
inconclusive due to the lack of a dose-dependent
response (a significant reduction in vertebral fracture
risk was found in the 200 IU daily calcitonin dose but
not in the 100 IU and 400 IU doses), the lack of
supporting BMD data, and a 60%
dropout rate. Salmon calcitonin (Miacalcin)
inhaled as a nasal spray is preferable to oral forms in
development, which may cause nausea and diarrhea.
Remarkably, PTH may also be used to
treat osteoporosis. As mentioned above, PTH enables bone
destruction and opposes the bone strengthening activity
of calcitonin. However, research presented in the May
10, 2001 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine
suggests that PTH (1-34), also called Forteo -- an
experimental form of parathyroid hormone comprising the
first 34 (of 84) hormonal amino acids -- has the
opposite effect by stimulating osteoblasts and promoting
bone growth. In their study of 1,326 postmenopausal
women in 17 countries, Robert M. Neer, M.D., of Harvard
Medical School and colleagues found that treatment with
PTH (1-34) in 20 µg and 40 µg doses increased spinal BMD
by an average of 11% (compared with placebo), and
decreased the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral
fractures by an average of 67% and 37%, respectively
(compared with placebo). PTH (1-34) was well-tolerated;
the most common adverse events were nausea and headache,
which were more prevalent in the 40 µg arm. PTH (1-34)
must be taken daily by self-injection, a potential
drawback for some people. In addition, the study was
halted when osteosarcomas (malignant bone tumors) were
found in rats during a separate, long-term toxicologic
study of the drug. While none of the women developed
bone tumors in the clinical trial conducted by Dr. Neer
and colleagues, future use of the drug may be limited in
persons with compromised immune systems.
As mentioned previously, adequate sex
hormone levels are important for bone health in both men
and women. Supplementation with testosterone is
recommended in HIV-positive men who have low levels of
the hormone (compared with healthy controls). According
to Dr. Grinspoon, testosterone treatment also benefits
eugonadal men (i.e., with normal testosterone levels)
experiencing AIDS wasting. (Testosterone supplementation
in women may cause unwanted masculinizing effects and is
under study at this time.) Similarly, anabolic steroids
(synthetic testosterone derivatives) such as oxandrolone
(Oxandrin) may prove beneficial as bone treatments.
Human growth hormone (HGH, somatotropin, Serostim) is
also being investigated by some physicians to counteract
bone loss in people with HIV, perhaps by restoring
imbalances in the growth hormone-IGF-1 axis. Like
testosterone and anabolic steroids, HGH is used mainly
to treat AIDS-related wasting syndrome and, in some
cases, visceral fat accumulation. Statin drugs (e.g.,
pravastatin [Pravachol]), which are used to treat high
blood lipid (fat) levels, have not been associated with
a reduction in the risk of bone fractures. For women,
hormone (typically estrogen) replacement therapy or
selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs, e.g.,
raloxifene [Evista]) are accepted osteoporosis treatment
strategies.
Therapies that address potential
causes of low BMD such as altered cytokine levels might
play a role in the future management of the condition.
Proinflammatory cytokine modulators may include omega-3
fatty acids (found in fish oils) and flavonoids (plant
extracts) such as quercetin, curcumin, boswellia, and
Pycnogenol. Ipriflavone, however, is not recommended as
a treatment for bone wasting. This synthetic flavonoid
has not been found in clinical trials to prevent bone
loss or improve biochemical bone markers and it appears
to induce lymphocytopenia (a reduction in blood
lymphocytes).
In addition to therapeutic and dietary
interventions, reducing alcohol intake and eliminating
tobacco smoking should be encouraged in all persons with
low BMD. Almost all studies to date have shown that even
moderate levels of alcohol consumption (1-2 drinks per
day) contribute to osteopenia, although one curious
study published in the November 2000 issue of the
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that
moderate alcohol consumption increased BMD in an
analysis of 489 postmenopausal women. As with alcohol
intake, tobacco smoking has been linked to osteopenia.
Nicotine may also inhibit fracture repair.
Prevention
Until more is known about the etiology
(cause) of osteopenia and osteoporosis in HIV-positive
persons, certain lifestyle behaviors may contribute to
optimal skeletal health. These include sufficient
calcium and vitamin D intake throughout life; an
adequate, balanced diet; regular weight-bearing
exercise; avoidance of tobacco and alcohol; and limited
glucocorticoid use.
Recommendations
Even though nearly all HIV-positive
persons with osteopenia and osteoporosis to date have
been asymptomatic, reports of fractures are expected to
increase in the coming years. Routine BMD screening for
all persons with HIV infection is strongly recommended
by Dr. Romeyn and other (though not all) researchers.
Screening should include a baseline DEXA measurement as
well as annual BMD monitoring. Osteoporosis screening is
especially needed for people with HIV who are more prone
to severely low bone mineral levels and related adverse
effects, including those with a documented episode of
AIDS wasting, a low CD4 cell nadir, or a history of
prior fractures. In addition, improved treatments for
osteoporosis should continue to be explored and tested.
Future strategies to combat bone deterioration will
clearly benefit the general population. |