Beware of scams
like coral calcium. Coral Calcium has been shown in
scientific studies--including those on humans-to be no
more available to the body than other forms of calcium.
As such, the infomercial claims about calcium from coral
being a "superior" calcium are simply not true
Coral Calcium
Claims
The principal promoter of coral calcium
is Robert Barefoot. In his infomercial, he states, "Over
200 degenerative diseases are caused by calcium
deficiency. That includes cancer, heart disease,
diabetes, Alzheimer's, you name it. These diseases are
caused by acidosis -- acidification of the body -- and
lack of minerals, especially calcium. When you start
taking coral calcium, your body alkalizes and drives out
the acid."
Barefoot's theory is that in a healthy
person, body fluids are alkaline with a high pH reading
and high in oxygen levels, whereas in a sick person,
body fluids are acidic with a low pH reading and low in
oxygen levels.
He claims scientists have found that
many diseases thrive in an acidic, low-oxygen
environment, but cannot survive in an alkaline,
high-oxygen medium. So he concludes that to ensure
health, the body should have an oxygen-rich alkalinity
of around 7.5, making it incapable of hosting diseases
like cancer.
What the
Experts Say
"There are no data to support Barefoot's
claims that coral calcium is effective against a large
range of diseases," says Stephen Barrett, MD, whose Web
site QuackWatch.org contains a lengthy investigation on
coral calcium.
While it can be effective against some
symptoms of stomach distress, Barefoot's claim that his
product is effective against more than 200 diseases is
preposterous. The idea that coral calcium could reverse
cancer is ridiculous, and this kind of advertising is
irresponsible, dangerous, and very illegal, and I don't
think it's going to last."
The Federal Trade Commission agrees. In
June, the FTC charged Barefoot and associates with
making false and unsubtantiated claims about his
product. The FTC and the FDA also warned others against
making similar claims.
Barrett, who is a retired psychiatrist
and vice president of the National Council Against
Health Fraud, tells WebMD that although some people may
not be getting enough calcium in their diet, and a
supplement may be necessary, coral calcium is not the
answer.
"There is no reason to buy coral calcium
because it's overpriced and it may contain things that
you don't want," says Barrett. Coral calcium has not
been extensively tested, explains Barrett, and it is not
known what it actually contains. It could contain
contaminants from the ocean, which has been polluted.
"Since it costs more, and isn't any
better than a purified calcium supplement, it doesn't
make sense to buy it," says Barrett. "And, the trace
minerals that it may or may not contain are usually
obtained through a healthy diet -- you don't need coral
calcium to get them."
Coral calcium is just another source of
calcium, whether you're getting it from carbonate,
citrate, lactate, or coral calcium," says Miller. "I'm
not aware of any data that suggests coral calcium has
any benefits that normal calcium does not give you, and
the disadvantage to taking it is cost."
Be Wary of Coral Calcium and Robert Barefoot
Stephen Barrett, M.D.
"Coral calcium" is a dietary supplement said to be
derived from "remnants of living coral that have fallen
from coral reefs, as a result of wave action or other
natural processes." It is also said to be mined from the
old ocean beds at the base of the coral reefs in
Okinawa, Japan [1:120]. Simply put, "coral remnants" are
limestone, which coral organisms originally manufacture
as a protective shell. Since coral reefs are protected
by law, "coral calcium" is made by grinding up limestone
that no longer contains live organisms.
Limestone has no unique health properties. It is
merely calcium carbonate, with some magnesium and trace
amounts of many other minerals. Limestone fertilizer,
available at garden centers, costs as little as a dollar
for an 80-pound bag. (Note: Limestone fertilizer is not
suitable for human use as a calcium supplement. I
mention it only to illustrate how inexpensive the raw
ingredients can be.) For people who need to consume
extra calcium, purified calcium carbonate pills are
safer and far less expensive than "coral calcium." But
Robert R. Barefoot, of Wickenberg, Arizona, would like
you to believe that limestone obtained from Okinawa
provides "the scientific secret of health and youth" and
can cure cancer. His ideas are promoted through books,
lectures, his Web site, an audiotape, two 30-minute
infomercials [2], interviews, and thousands of Web sites
that sell "coral calcium" products. Although his sales
pitch is preposterous, he has gained a wide audience.
During the past two years, I have received more than 200
e-mail inquiries stimulated by his infomercial, which is
more than I have received about any other product. His
book, The Calcium Factor [1], first published in
1992, has undergone five editions and on January 31,
2003 enjoyed an Amazon Books sales rank of #412, which
is extremely high. On the same day, his Death By Diet
[3], originally published in 1996 and now in its
fourth edition, was ranked #1790; and his other book,
Barefoot on Coral Calcium [4], was ranked #8114.
Searching
Google for "Robert Barefoot" yielded more than
31,000 hits, and searching for "coral calcium" found
more than 80,000! In January and February,
Barefoot's "A Closer Look" infomercial was among the
most frequently shown infomercials and was the most
frequent one connected with a dietary supplement. In
March 2003, a newer infomercial version hit #1 on the
frequency list and a Google Search for "coral calcium
topped 120,000. Barefoot's
Cure America Web
site listed his email address as
kingofcalcium@hotmail.com, which, considering his
probable sales volume, is probably an apt description.
Questionable Credentials
Thousands of Web sites refer to Barefoot as "Dr.
Robert Barefoot" or Robert Barefoot, Ph.D. However, he
is not a medical doctor and does not have a Ph.D.
degree. In 1999, Barefoot was not permitted to testify
as an expert in a case in which the Maryland Attorney
General stopped the marketing of T-Up (an aloe vera
concentrate) and cesium chloride for the treatment of
cancer and AIDS. The case was extremely serious because
the regimen had killed several of its users. During
hearings in the case, the defendants sought to have
Barefoot testify that cesium was effective.
The curriculum vitae that Barefoot submitted
described his formal education after high school as
"1964 Northern
Alberta Institute of Technology, Chemistry" and
"1967 Graduated with Honors, Chemical Research
Technology." [12] This means that his highest
educational credential is a diploma (not a university
degree) that reflects only three years of coursework.
The presiding Administrative Law Judge noted that
Barefoot had formal training and experience in inorganic
chemistry but had not had any professionally supported
or supervised training or done any professionally
recognized research in organic chemistry and
biochemistry in the human body. Although Barefoot
described having many discussions with doctors and
patients about using cesium for treating cancer, the
judge concluded that "this experience and study was not
scientific." In 2000, a civil court judge ordered the
defendants to pay millions of dollars in restitution and
$3.7 million in civil penalties [13,14]. In 2001, the
Maryland Court of Special Appeals upheld this decision
in a ruling that explained why Barefoot's exclusion had
been justified [15]. One of the defendants received a
46-month prison sentence in a parallel criminal case
[16].
Web sites also describe Barefoot as a "world-renowned
chemist." His curriculum vitae states that between 1968
and 1972 he published six scientific research papers on
analytical chemistry and diagenesis. Diagenesis
refers to the changes that occur in sediments as they
are buried under other sediments. This appears to have
some relevance to the formation of limestone, but it
certainly has nothing to do with human biology or human
health. Searching Medline, which is the most
comprehensive database of medically-related journals, I
located no articles with Barefoot listed as author. His
curriculum vitae states that he has patented an
ore-extraction process and headed two companies that
serviced the petroleum industry. His marketing
activities have attracted considerable attention, but I
doubt that he deserves to be called a "renowned
chemist."
Coral calcium
products are a waste of money, and some are irrationally
formulated. For professional advice on calcium intake,
ask a registered dietitian (R.D.) or physician to help
you.
For Additional Information
Here are
some more articles which prove coral calcium is a scam:
Coral Calcium - 7 Sneaky Tricks Coral Calcium Vendors
Employ
http://www.ultimatecoralcalcium.com/7sneaky.htm
Coral Calcium - Why Coral Calcium Vendors are Lying to
You
http://www.ultimatecoralcalcium.com/vendors.htm
FTC and FDA Take
New Actions in Fight Against Deceptive Marketing
FTC Charges Marketers of Coral Calcium Supreme Dietary
Supplement and a Pain-Relief Product With Making False
and Unsubstantiated Claims
The Federal Trade Commission has
charged the marketers of a dietary supplement called
Coral Calcium Supreme with making false and
unsubstantiated claims about the product's health
benefits. This action is part of a series of initiatives
the FTC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are
taking against the purveyors of products with
unsubstantiated health and medical claims. In a
complaint filed in federal district court, the FTC
alleges that Kevin Trudeau; Robert Barefoot; Shop
America (USA), LLC; and Deonna Enterprises, Inc.,
violated the FTC Act by claiming, falsely and without
substantiation, that Coral Calcium Supreme can treat or
cure cancer and other diseases, such as multiple
sclerosis and heart disease. The FTC charges that these
and other claims go far beyond existing scientific
evidence regarding the recognized health benefits of
calcium.
The defendants promote the product
primarily through a nationally televised 30-minute
infomercial featuring Trudeau and Barefoot, and through
statements made in brochures accompanying the product.
The informercial has aired on cable channels such as
Women's Entertainment, Comedy Central, the Discovery
Channel, and Bravo.
"The Commission has voiced strong
concerns about deceptive claims for dietary
supplements," said Howard Beales, Director of the FTC's
Bureau of Consumer Protection. "These cases demonstrate
that the FTC will take aggressive enforcement action,
particularly when, as alleged in this case, the products
are marketed as cures for serious diseases like cancer
and heart disease. Marketers who step over the line will
find themselves between a rock and a hard place."
In a separate action, the FTC has
charged one of the defendants, Kevin Trudeau, with
violating a 1998 federal district court order that
prohibits him from making unsubstantiated claims about
the benefits, performance, or efficacy of any products.
The FTC alleges that Trudeau violated that order by
making false and unsubstantiated claims about Coral
Calcium Supreme, and by making unsubstantiated claims
that another product, Biotape, provides significant or
permanent relief from severe pain, including
debilitating back pain, and pain from arthritis,
sciatica, and migraines. In both of these actions, the
FTC has asked the court for a temporary restraining
order that would prohibit the defendants from making the
challenged claims and would freeze their assets.
In related law enforcement efforts,
the FTC and the FDA are sending strong warning letters
to Web site operators who are marketing coral calcium
products claiming that coral calcium is an effective
treatment or cure for cancer and/or other diseases. In
dozens of warnings sent this week, the FTC states it is
aware of no competent and reliable scientific evidence
supporting such claims and that such unsupported claims
are unlawful under the FTC Act. Accordingly, the FTC is
instructing the Web site operators to remove any false
or deceptive claims from their sites immediately. In a
similar action, the FDA warned Web site operators that
disease claims and unsubstantiated structure/function
claims cause their products to be in violation of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
"FDA and FTC are working together to
maximize our efforts to combat heath fraud," said FDA
Commissioner Mark B. McCellan. "We are trying to be
particularly vigilant concerning fraudulent internet
promotion, because this is emerging as an increasingly
insidious way of trying to exploit the public."
FTC v. Kevin
Trudeau, Robert Barefoot, Shop America (USA), LLC, and
Deonna Enterprises
The FTC's first action alleges that
Kevin Trudeau, Robert Barefoot, Shop America (USA), LLC,
and Deonna Enterprises, Inc., violated the FTC Act by
claiming, falsely and without substantiation, that Coral
Calcium Supreme can treat or cure cancer and other
diseases such as multiple sclerosis and heart disease.
According to the FTC, Coral Calcium Supreme is a dietary
supplement purportedly comprised of marine coral from
Okinawa, Japan. A one-month supply of the product (90
capsules) costs $19.95.
The FTC's complaint alleges that the
defendants claim, falsely and without substantiation,
that Coral Calcium Supreme will treat and/or cure all
forms of cancer and other diseases such as multiple
sclerosis, lupus, heart disease, and chronic high blood
pressure. The complaint also alleges that the defendants
falsely claim that scientific research published in
reputable medical journals proves that calcium
supplements can reverse and/or cure all forms of cancer.
Finally, the complaint challenges the defendants' claims
that a daily serving of Coral Calcium Supreme provides
the same amount of bioavailable calcium as two gallons
of milk, and that the body absorbs significantly more of
the calcium in coral calcium - up to 100 times more, and
at a significantly faster rate - than the calcium
contained in commonly available calcium supplements. The
FTC is seeking preliminary and permanent injunctive
relief, including restitution to consumers who purchased
Coral Calcium Supreme. In addition, the FTC has asked
the court for a temporary restraining order that would
prohibit the defendants from making the challenged
claims, and would freeze their assets.
FTC v. Kevin Trudeau
The FTC's second action, against
Trudeau alone, alleges that Trudeau violated a 1998 FTC
order prohibiting him from making unsubstantiated claims
about the benefits, performance, or efficacy of any
product. The FTC alleges that Trudeau violated the order
by making false and unsubstantiated claims about Coral
Calcium Supreme, and also by making unsubstantiated
claims about Biotape. According to the FTC, Biotape is a
purported pain-relief product which Trudeau promotes
through a separate infomercial, which has aired on
national cable channels such PAX Television, the
Hallmark Channel, and E! Entertainment Television.
Consumers are instructed to place a strip of Biotape
directly on the parts of their bodies where they feel
pain. One sheet of Biotape, containing 10 strips, costs
approximately $10. In this action, the FTC is seeking a
finding of contempt, monetary relief, and other
injunctive relief, as well as a temporary restraining
order that would prohibit Trudeau from making the
challenged claims, and would freeze his assets.
Warning Letters
In addition to the FTC's federal
court actions, the Commission is sending warning letters
to dozens of Web site operators who are making similar
claims for coral calcium products. In the warning
letters, the FTC reminds the Web site operators that any
claim that coral calcium is an effective treatment or
cure for any disease must be supported by competent and
reliable scientific evidence to comply with the law. The
FTC states it is aware of no such evidence supporting
these claims, and that without the required support, the
claims are illegal under the FTC Act. Accordingly, the
FTC is instructing the Web site operators to remove any
false or deceptive claims from their sites immediately.
In a similar action, the FDA issued
warning letters to numerous Web site operators who are
promoting coral calcium on the Internet. The letters
cited the organizations for representing the products as
useful in the prevention or treatment of serious
diseases. In addition, a majority of the letters also
cited the firms for making unsubstantiated claims
regarding the effect of their products on the structure
or function of the body. The FDA letters warn the
recipients that FDA may initiate further enforcement
action if the violations are not corrected.
The FTC and FDA had conducted
Internet "surfs" and found numerous Web sites touting
coral calcium products as an effective treatment or cure
for cancer and other diseases such as lupus, multiple
sclerosis, and heart disease. The staffs of the two
agencies will follow up by revisiting the target sites
to determine whether the Web site operators gave deleted
or revised the unproven claims.
The FTC vote to authorize filing of
the cases was 5-0. The cases were filed in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
Eastern Division, on June 9, 2003.
Marketers of Coral Calcium Product Are Prohibited from
Making Disease Treatment and Cure Claims in Advertising
Under a settlement with the Federal
Trade Commission, Robert Barefoot, Deonna Enterprises,
Inc., and Karbo Enterprises, Inc. are prohibited from
making claims that the dietary supplement “Coral Calcium
Supreme” or any other coral calcium product can treat or
cure cancer, multiple sclerosis, heart disease, high
blood pressure, and other serious diseases. The
defendants also cannot make unsupported claims that the
body absorbs coral calcium better than other calcium
supplements in the market.
The settlement resolves charges in a
June 9, 2003 complaint filed by the Commission in the
federal district court alleging that the settling
defendants, together with defendants Kevin Trudeau, Shop
America (USA), LLC, Shop America Marketing Group, LLC,
and TruStar Global Media, Ltd., made false and
unsubstantiated claims in a widely disseminated
infomercial that Coral Calcium Supreme would treat or
cure cancer, MS, heart disease and other serious
diseases. The FTC also challenged claims that a daily
serving of Coral Calcium Supreme provides the same
amount of bioavailable calcium as two gallons of milk,
and that the body absorbs significantly more of the
calcium in coral calcium – up to 100 times more, and at
a significantly faster rate – than the calcium contained
in commonly available calcium supplements. (The case
against Kevin Trudeau and his companies still is
pending.)
The FTC alleges that the challenged
claims go far beyond the existing scientific evidence
concerning the recognized health benefits of calcium.
Under the settlement, the defendants
cannot make the challenged efficacy claims including
that scientific research proves that calcium supplements
are able to reverse or cure cancer in the human body.
The settlement also prohibits the defendants from making
the types of comparative bioavailability claims
challenged in the complaint. In addition, the settlement
prohibits the defendants from misrepresenting that any
dietary supplement can prevent, treat, or cure any
disease and from making unsubstantiated claims about the
health benefits, performance,or efficacy for all dietary
supplements, foods, drugs, cosmetics, devices, or
services. The settlement further prohibits the
defendants from misrepresenting the existence, contents,
validity, results, conclusions, or interpretations of
any test or study for any foods, drugs, dietary
supplements, cosmetics, or services.
The settlement requires the
defendants to recall any product packaging that makes
the challenged claims. It also requires them to send a
notice to resellers and distributors advising them of
the FTC’s action, and directing them to stop using
promotional materials containing the deceptive claims,
and informing them that if they do not comply, the
defendants will stop doing business with them.
The settlement allows the FTC to
recover all royalties owed to defendant Barefoot in
connection with the Coral Calcium Supreme infomercial
marketing. Based on the defendants’ financial condition,
the settlement does not require additional redress. The
settlement does, however, contain an avalanche clause of
$3 million, if the court finds that the defendants
misrepresented their financial condition.
Finally, the settlement contains
various recordkeeping requirements to assist the FTC in
monitoring the defendants’ compliance.
The Commission vote to authorize
staff to file the proposed stipulated final order for
permanent injunction was 5-0. The stipulated final order
was entered by the U.S. District Court, Northern
District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on January 15,
2004.
Copies of the stipulated final order for
permanent injunction are available from the FTC’s Web
site at
http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTC’s Consumer
Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue,
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The FTC works for the
consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair
business practices in the marketplace and to provide
information to help consumers spot, stop, and avoid
them. To file a complaint, or to get free information on
any of 150 consumer topics, call toll-free,
1-877-FTC-HELP (1 877-382-4357), or use the complaint
form at
http://www.ftc.gov. The FTC enters Internet,
telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related
complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online
database available to hundreds of civil and criminal law
enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. |